What are the differences between an art- and a financial investments and
what determines the rate of profits of these? How to measure the
psychic benefits from investments in art and which are the determinants?
The rate of returns on investments in paintings is lower than for
investments in financial assets, the psychic returns from owning and
viewing the painting makes art more attractive. There is a huge
importance of behavioural anomalies in the art deals. It has been shown
that there are a lot of irrationalities such as January-,
holiday-effects in the art markets which are very common. For a market
to be efficient, it is more preferable to have only a few persons
arbitraging. The fact that the market is only partly open, short selling
is quiet impossible and there is a dependence of the art prices on
political intervention makes the art market more likely to be efficient.
Art can be seen as an investment good, but also as a consumption good.
The most important determinants which make the difference between these
two categories are risk, costs and taxes. The return from owning art is
not only an expected price rise but also a psychic return. The psychic
return can be measured by the willingness from the buyers to rent an art
work, or the willingness to visit a museum where it is shown.
matthias van der schueren
Bruno S. Frey, Reiner Eichenberger, "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0014292194000599"
While there is an increasing awareness of art for financial reasons I think it’s interesting that this article tries to somehow calculate the psychic return people receive from possessing art. I think investigating the willingness from the buyers to rent an art work, or the willingness to visit a museum are good ways to do this.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenWard